data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b19d4/b19d4d538df959cce28445aec90bfea728d82cc3" alt="Pirates of the caribbean on stranger tides cost"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34e2d/34e2dc48d9ca5c3e37482d85b78eb90d8a395f2e" alt="pirates of the caribbean on stranger tides cost pirates of the caribbean on stranger tides cost"
- PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN ON STRANGER TIDES COST MOVIE
- PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN ON STRANGER TIDES COST FULL
- PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN ON STRANGER TIDES COST TV
I'm very happy to hear from those who have seen the new instal that it's very good!
PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN ON STRANGER TIDES COST MOVIE
I'm a movie goer who enjoys trilogies and continued stories and Pirates in one of my top favs. Just a disappointing movie overall, too many things to not enjoy and nit pick.īUT I'm one of the rare few people that truly enjoyed every single film from the first 'trilogy', I really like Dead Man's Chest and At World's End, and I totally get why two of those three didn't jive with everyone.
PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN ON STRANGER TIDES COST TV
Yeah I had never seen the movie in it's entirety before, and I caught it in tv the other day, I was so surprised by how much time they spent NOT on ships and instead walking around everywhere, and having these scenes that first, were WAY drawn out, and they took place on shitty looking sets, and I was confused because I thought "what the fuck kind of movie did they make" and I realized how they blew SO MUCH money on making sets for the movie, and it just did NOT look good. I can take a 2 person team into a remote rugged mountain area with just a crappy 20 year old rented pickup and get more done, in fewer days, than with 4-5 people in a good new boat. For me it instantly doubles the # of people (and salary is always the biggest cost).
PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN ON STRANGER TIDES COST FULL
Three, you have the full boat crew in addition to your regular crew. It's a given in biology that boat projects cost almost as much as air-based research (helicopter/plane based aerial projects) because of the constant fuel burn. You lose a lot of time maneuvering, and fuel costs are insane. This goes triple if you're trying to maintain a certain distance from other vessels (which are also drifting around). So you have to CONSTANTLY burn fuel just to re-maneuver back into position and then hold position. Nothing stays goddam PUT it's infuriating. The whole time everybody was still being paid & still needed food & housing. The other 53 days the entire crew was stuck on land due to some combination of wind, fog, rain, and sea state. In my last project we managed to get only 7 days on the water out of a total of 60 days on site. I never used to pay attention to wind but now, if I feel a puff of wind, an alarm bell goes off in my head about "Is the wind picking up? Are we gonna lose our sea state? Do we have to head in?" (It's a major safety concern in small vessels since they can run into real trouble fast in big waves - a normal work day can go from routine to life-threatening in a single hour if the wind changes.) I look at those Pirates movies and I can see they are only filming at sea states 0, 1 and maybe 2 so any day with 3 or above, they clearly couldn't go out. On water you not only have to wait for clear skies but also no wind and often the right tide and low waves (low Beaufort sea state, highly connected to wind). I do biology research, some on water and some on land, and a similar thing happens in the grant budgets in that boat-based grants regularly come in 50% more expensive or higher. What I'm trying to say is they didn't need that much money, and I'm not sure why they thought an extra 128.5 million for the budget was worth it. Don't give me that 'they knew they would make their money back' it makes no sense to make the 4th pirates of the Carribean film that expensive. Like, who greenlit that massive budget? Why was a 378.5 million dollar film necessary, why not a 250 million dollar film? Makes no sense whatsoever.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f58c8/f58c8ef39d8f577378ec1e2a692c65970ca44da5" alt="pirates of the caribbean on stranger tides cost pirates of the caribbean on stranger tides cost"
They could have made the same film for 250 million. People like pirates of the Carribean, but this wasn't some event film, they knew they'd make more, WHY did this film cost so much? I just think it's literally Disney not caring about their money. And also marvel is the most successful franchise in cinema history so it makes sense that they'd wanna give themselves a grand finale Look, that's crazy, but it makes sense when you think RDJ will prob get 50 mil for both and they have to pay essentially 20 A-Listers. Big event film, third and what was going to be the final film, it makes sense.Īvengers Infinity War and the 4th film will each have budgets of 500 million apparently. I can almost understand 300 million for pirates at worlds end. This post needs to be made because WHY DID DISNEY ALLOW THIS MOVIE TO HAVE SUCH A MASSIVE BUDGET Civil war went to 250 million but that was mostly for salaries. Every marvel film hovers around the 200 million mark. Even Avatar had a normal blockbuster film budget of 237 million. It's almost inexcusable that a film could cost more than 200-250 million in today's day and age.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b19d4/b19d4d538df959cce28445aec90bfea728d82cc3" alt="Pirates of the caribbean on stranger tides cost"